Dynamics 365

D365 2024 Wave 2 - What Actually Shipped vs What Microsoft Promised

December 27, 2024 Steven Singer 12 min read

Microsoft's 2024 Wave 2 release for Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations went GA in October. We've now had two months to test these features in our sandbox environment at Julius Silvert, and I've talked to a dozen other F&O customers about their experiences. Here's my honest assessment of what shipped, what works, and what's still marketing vapor.

D365 2024 Wave 2

For context: we're a $110M food distribution company in the middle of migrating from VAI S2K to D365 F&O. We run catch weight inventory, complex pricing matrices, and integrate with BFC Dakota for warehouse management. Our use case stress-tests a lot of these new features.

The Copilot Features - Mostly Hype, Some Substance

Let's get the elephant out of the room. Microsoft has been pushing Copilot into everything, and D365 F&O is no exception. Here's what actually shipped:

Copilot in Finance (Accounts Receivable)

The collections Copilot is legitimately useful. It summarizes customer payment history, flags at-risk accounts, and drafts collection emails. Our AR team tested it for three weeks. The time savings are real - about 2 hours per week for a team of 4. The AI-drafted emails need editing (they're too formal for our customer relationships), but having a starting point helps.

Grade: B+

Copilot in Supply Chain (Demand Planning)

This one disappoints me. Microsoft promised AI-driven demand forecasting that would learn from your historical patterns. What shipped is basically a chatbot interface for your existing forecast data. You can ask "what's the forecast for ribeye next month" and it'll tell you, but that's just a natural language query layer - not actual AI forecasting.

The real AI forecasting capabilities are still in preview and require Demand Planning as a separate module. For food distribution with short shelf life products and seasonal demand, I was hoping for more.

Grade: C

Copilot in Warehouse Management

Didn't ship. The roadmap showed AI-assisted wave planning and pick optimization. What we got was some minor mobile app improvements. This feature got pushed to 2025 Wave 1 (allegedly).

Grade: Incomplete

Catch Weight Improvements - Actually Meaningful

As a food distributor, catch weight is core to our business. Wave 2 delivered some improvements I've been requesting through UserVoice for years:

Dual-unit sales orders: You can now enter orders in either the inventory unit or the catch weight unit and the system converts automatically. Previously, this required custom code. For us, this means customers can order "10 cases of ribeye" or "450 pounds of ribeye" and the system handles it natively.

Catch weight tolerance by product group: Different products have different acceptable weight ranges. A case of ground beef might vary by 3 pounds; a case of microgreens might vary by half a pound. You can now set tolerances at the product group level instead of individually.

Better reporting: The inventory valuation reports now properly account for catch weight variance. This sounds boring but was a nightmare for our finance team at month-end.

Grade: A-

Warehouse Management Updates

We integrate D365 with BFC Dakota for WMS, so not all of these apply to us directly. But for companies using D365's native warehouse management:

Mobile device improvements: The warehouse mobile app got visual updates and faster scanning. Field testers report 15-20% faster pick times due to reduced screen transitions. This is a genuine improvement.

Wave template enhancements: More flexibility in how waves are constructed and released. You can now create wave templates that split large orders across multiple picks based on weight or cube thresholds. Useful for food distribution where truck capacity is the constraint.

Inventory visibility updates: The ATP (available-to-promise) calculations got faster and more accurate. Microsoft claims 40% improvement in calculation speed for high-volume environments. I can't independently verify, but our sandbox feels snappier.

Grade: B

Finance Module Updates

Revenue recognition improvements: Better support for complex revenue recognition scenarios with multiple performance obligations. Not relevant for distribution, but I know some manufacturing folks who were waiting for this.

Fixed assets enhancements: Bulk depreciation adjustments and improved disposal workflows. Minor but welcome.

Bank reconciliation AI: This actually works. The system suggests matches for unreconciled items with surprisingly good accuracy. Our AP team has reduced manual reconciliation time by about 30%.

Grade: B+

Integration and Platform Updates

Dual-write improvements: If you're using Dataverse integration (and you should be for Power Platform connectivity), dual-write got more reliable. We've seen fewer sync failures since the update. The error messages are also more actionable now - they tell you which field caused the failure instead of generic "sync failed" messages.

Data entity performance: Many standard data entities got performance optimizations. Our nightly data exports to Azure Data Lake are running 25% faster on the same data volumes.

API versioning: Better support for API versioning means we can upgrade without breaking our Adobe Commerce integration. This was a real concern going into 2024.

Grade: A-

What's Still Missing

Every release, I look for certain features that never seem to materialize:

True multi-company ease: Managing multiple legal entities is still clunky. We have Julius Silvert Inc. and Charm City Prime as separate entities with different tax requirements. Switching between them and managing shared vendors is still more manual than it should be.

Mobile sales app: Our sales reps want a native mobile app for customer visits - checking inventory, placing orders, viewing history. The current options are either clunky or require significant custom development.

Better EDI: EDI integration is still largely third-party dependent. For food distribution where many customers require EDI ordering, native support would be valuable.

Lot management for FSMA compliance: Food Safety Modernization Act requires detailed traceability. D365's lot tracking works but isn't purpose-built for FDA compliance. We still supplement with manual processes.

The Upgrade Experience

One thing Microsoft has genuinely improved is the update process itself. We took the 10.0.40 update (Wave 2 foundation) in our sandbox, ran our regression tests, and deployed to production in under 3 days total. Compare that to the week-long nightmares of earlier versions.

The Regression Suite Automation Tool (RSAT) continues to be worth the setup investment. We have about 180 test cases that run automatically after each update. This release caught two issues - one with a custom report and one with our WMS integration - before they hit production.

Upgrade Tip

Always take updates to sandbox first, run RSAT, and give your power users a week to validate their workflows before production. The extra time is worth it.

Licensing Changes

Microsoft made some licensing adjustments with Wave 2 that are worth noting:

Copilot features require the existing F&O license - no additional licensing for the basic Copilot capabilities that shipped. However, the more advanced AI features (like the demand planning AI) require additional licensing through AI Builder credits or the Copilot Studio licensing.

The Team Members license got slightly more useful - you can now do more read operations without a full license. Good for warehouse supervisors who need visibility but don't transact.

Comparison to Competition

I keep an eye on what SAP, Oracle, and others are doing. Here's my honest comparison:

SAP S/4HANA: Still ahead on manufacturing complexity, but their cloud story remains confusing. The licensing costs for comparable functionality are still 30-40% higher than D365.

Oracle NetSuite: Gaining ground in mid-market. Their Wave 2 equivalent focused heavily on AI-driven analytics. For pure finance, NetSuite might actually be ahead now. For supply chain, D365 maintains the edge.

Infor CloudSuite: Strong in food manufacturing but their food distribution offering is weaker. If you're a processor, consider them. If you're a distributor, D365 is better.

Bottom Line

D365 2024 Wave 2 is a solid incremental release. It's not transformational - there's no single feature that will change how you do business. But the accumulation of improvements in catch weight, warehouse management, and platform reliability make the upgrade worthwhile.

The Copilot features are a mixed bag. Some (like collections and bank rec) provide real value. Others are more marketing than substance. Don't make upgrade decisions based on Copilot promises alone.

For organizations like Julius Silvert in the middle of a major D365 implementation, Wave 2 gives confidence that we're on the right platform. Microsoft continues to invest, the features we need are getting better, and the ecosystem (partners, ISVs, community) remains strong.

Now I need to update our migration timeline to take advantage of the new catch weight features. Our implementation partner is going to love that scope change request.

#Dynamics365 #D365FO #ERP #Copilot #FoodDistribution #CatchWeight
← Back to Blog Next Post →

Planning an ERP modernization?

6 SAP-to-Dynamics conversions with zero business disruption. Let's discuss your project.

ERP Services Book a Call